SE251:Session7Group6
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Assessment criteria | Score |
---|---|
The session content is relevant to the course | 5 |
The session has been a useful aid to your own learning | 4 |
The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented | 5 |
You have learnt something new from the session | 5 |
Justification for the above scores
- Relevance: As with all other postmorterms, it covers an assignment from the course
- Useful: Slight repetition of material covered, but good nonetheless
- Understood: Only a few minor errors, everything else done well
- Learnt: The checkerboard nestingshape was something new
One aspect of the session that was particularly good
- Giving possible different implementations of the path() method was good
One part of the session that could have been improved
- A bit of repetition as mentioned above, but this is understandably a shorter assignment and does not have material to be covered by everyone.
Peer assessors present
- Abdulrahman Hizam Omran (aomr001)
- Hung Pan (hpan027)
- Tzu-Lun Wong (twon069)
- Zijie Yang (zyan057)