SE251:Session4Group5

Assessment criteria	Score
The session content is relevant to the course	5
The session has been a useful aid to your own learning	5
The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented	4
You have learnt something new from the session	4

Justification for the above scores

- The content was all centered beautifully round generics, interfaces and collections framework.
- I actively participated which was unusual and I took an genuine interest when I made a mistake.
- I'm not sure if the material was that well understood because some questions were not that well explained, but the group was good as a whole.
- The short answer questions drew out a few things I didn't already know.

One aspect of the session that was particularly good

I thought the prize was a great idea and I found myself more actively participating. Maybe this could be incorporated into lectures.

One part of the session that could have been improved

- I found that the explanations of the questions were a little weak and there could have been much more depth.
- Questions could have been a little more broad testing a few more concepts in each.
- I found the questions too abstract and hard to follow and could be a little more cohesive (i.e ice cream question)

Peer assessors present

Vincent Jean-Seong Budelmann (vbud003)