SE251:Session3Group7
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Assessment criteria | Score |
|---|---|
| The session content is relevant to the course | 5 |
| The session has been a useful aid to your own learning | 5 |
| The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented | 5 |
| You have learnt something new from the session | 5 |
Justification for the above scores
The part A explanations were adequate. The code's function was explained well but lacked additional explanation on the thought process in the creation of the code. The second part B were very clear and informative and provided a good example of OO programming, especially the optional task.
One aspect of the session that was particularly good
The OO implementation explanation was very detailed.
One part of the session that could have been improved
Overall the session was good.
Peer assessors present
Joon Ha Park (jpar277)
Varun Prasad (vpra017)
Archana Pratthi (apra102)
Matthew Scott Spencer (mspe044)
Tom Yige Lou (tlou006)