SE251:Session3Group6
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Assessment criteria | Score |
|---|---|
| The session content is relevant to the course | 5 |
| The session has been a useful aid to your own learning | 5 |
| The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented | 5 |
| You have learnt something new from the session | 5 |
Justification for the above scores
This session was pretty different from what has been done so far. The relevance is a given, because we've all had to work our way through the assignment. It was very interesting to see what other people came up as solutions, and certainly taught us a few approaches we didn't think of ourselves. The team presenting seemed to all knew what they were doing, especially the last person, who obviously put a lot of effort into his programme.
One aspect of the session that was particularly good
Seeing how other people approach the problems, in both the code and in the discussions about the code, was very interesting.
One part of the session that could have been improved
A bit of repetitive having everyone go through their code. Perhaps simply highlighting the differences would have been enough.
Peer assessors present
- Abdulrahman Hizam Omran (aomr001)
- Hung Pan (hpan027)
- Tzu-Lun Wong (twon069)
- Zijie Yang (zyan057)