SE251:Session3Group2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Assessment criteria | Score |
---|---|
The session content is relevant to the course | 5 |
The session has been a useful aid to your own learning | 4 |
The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented | 5 |
You have learnt something new from the session | 5 |
Justification for the above scores
The groud show us what they have done on the signment,different people show us the different ways to solve the problem, and how to test it work it more correctly.
One aspect of the session that was particularly good
One of them show us the different way show the work inside the code, like print out each statement each transection.
One part of the session that could have been improved
one guy show us the problem,but didnt clearly explain why it wrong and how to fix it.
Peer assessors present
Shu Fang Huang (shua066)
Laura Joan Laycock (llay008)
Mohammad Abdulnasir Abdullatif (mabd065)
Hussain Al-Saady (hals016)
Sidney Tsang (stsa027)