MECHENG401:Meetings:Initial
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
Attendance
Auckland City Council:
- Patrick Cummuskey
 
University of Auckland:
- Gerald Weber (CS)
 - Cristof Lutteroth (CS)
 - Jason Ingham (Civil)
 
Software Engineering Students:
- Shaun Seo
 - Nick Irvine
 
Civil Engineering Students:
- Russell
 - Matt
 - Allister? (PHD student)
 
Apologies by Mark Gardiner (SE)
Things discussed
Background
New legislation requiring compliance. Preliminary stages of compliance completed by Patrick.
2 screenings of buildings, to carry out an accurate assessment of a building's strength:
- 1st: preliminary, basic
 - 2nd: If a building fails the first assessment, a second more comprehensive(advanced) survey is carried out.
 
- This process is currently all manual and there is no infrastructure to support it. It needs to be supported to reduce cost and time taken.
 
Aims
- Application that can:
- Store all the data relevant to an assessment of a buildings strength/susceptibility to damage in an earthquake
 - analyze the data to determine if a building passes the first screening
 - Generate reports from the data that satisfy all the necessary requirements and standards, in a printable and easily storable/transferable format
 
 
Requirements
- Data stored should be easily exchangeable with other systems
 
Current process
- Surveys carried out manually
 - Advanced survey/calculations done by hand and on paper
 - Paper copy report generated and stored
 
Constraints
- Privacy concerns
- The general public should not be able to access all data about buildings. This is to prevent situations where a building is identified as earthquake prone and this leads to a drop in value/rental incomes and possible repercussions to the council.
 
 
- Scalability
- Scalable to all NZ councils, and nationally
 - Current ~4,500 buildings have been surveyed. Small amount of text and 0 -> a few photos. This is approx 6GB of data. ~1,500 buildings are likely to need more comprehensive survey. ~20 photos + plans + reports per building hence large size of data set.
 
 
Possible future goals
- Make the system available to other councils in NZ
 - Combine the databases to develop a national database
 - Interoperability with existing/new council systems
 - Integration with GIS or other systems
 
Users
Envisioned 3 types of end users:
- Property owners - can view details about their properties
 - Council officers - Process and use data stored in the system e.g to approve plans
 - Academics, Govt., emergency services - Make high level analysis/plans using the information available and the reports generated