SE251:Session3Group2

From Marks Wiki
Revision as of 05:20, 3 November 2008 by Mark (talk | contribs) (7 revision(s))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Assessment criteria Score
The session content is relevant to the course 5
The session has been a useful aid to your own learning 4
The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented 5
You have learnt something new from the session 5


Justification for the above scores

The groud show us what they have done on the signment,different people show us the different ways to solve the problem, and how to test it work it more correctly.

One aspect of the session that was particularly good

One of them show us the different way show the work inside the code, like print out each statement each transection.

One part of the session that could have been improved

one guy show us the problem,but didnt clearly explain why it wrong and how to fix it.

Peer assessors present

Shu Fang Huang (shua066)

Laura Joan Laycock (llay008)

Mohammad Abdulnasir Abdullatif (mabd065)

Hussain Al-Saady (hals016)

Sidney Tsang (stsa027)