SE251:Session 2 report by group 4
Assessment criteria | Score |
---|---|
The session content is relevant to the course | 5 |
The session has been a useful aid to your own learning | 4 |
The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented | 4 |
You have learnt something new from the session | 4 |
Justification for the above scores
- Question 2257: Good, demonstrates a number of important OO concepts
- Question 2255: Again, requires knowledge of a range of concepts
- Question 2221: Sound question on method overloading, but could have been expanded to address other topics
- Question 2212: Interesting question, though not as useful as the others
One aspect of the session that was particularly good
- Crossword was an innovative and effective way of testing OO material and introducing some new knowedge
One part of the session that could have been improved
- Some coverage of exception handling would have been nice and timely
Peer assessors present
- Krishant Lodhia (klod004)
- Arshdeep Singh (asin185)
- Haroun Barazanchi (hbar055)
- Anushka Lakmal Nanayakkara (anan019)
- Qi-Shan Lim (qlim001)