SE251:Session 2 report by group 4

From Marks Wiki
Revision as of 05:20, 3 November 2008 by Mark (talk | contribs) (1 revision(s))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search




Assessment criteria Score
The session content is relevant to the course 5
The session has been a useful aid to your own learning 4
The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented 4
You have learnt something new from the session 4


Justification for the above scores

  • Question 2257: Good, demonstrates a number of important OO concepts
  • Question 2255: Again, requires knowledge of a range of concepts
  • Question 2221: Sound question on method overloading, but could have been expanded to address other topics
  • Question 2212: Interesting question, though not as useful as the others

One aspect of the session that was particularly good

  • Crossword was an innovative and effective way of testing OO material and introducing some new knowedge

One part of the session that could have been improved

  • Some coverage of exception handling would have been nice and timely

Peer assessors present

  • Krishant Lodhia (klod004)
  • Arshdeep Singh (asin185)
  • Haroun Barazanchi (hbar055)
  • Anushka Lakmal Nanayakkara (anan019)
  • Qi-Shan Lim (qlim001)