SE251:Session 1 report by group 6

From Marks Wiki
Revision as of 05:20, 3 November 2008 by Mark (talk | contribs) (1 revision(s))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Assessment criteria Score
The session content is relevant to the course 5
The session has been a useful aid to your own learning 4
The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented 5
You have learnt something new from the session 4


Justification for the above scores

  • We thought it was pretty relevant because it covered most of the things we did this week.
  • It was useful because it showed us what works and what doesn't.
  • They knew what they were talking about and didn't make any mistakes. Plus they answered questions people asked.
  • Even though we knew some of the stuff already, we still learned plenty.

One aspect of the session that was particularly good

  • They went through and covered all of the possible solutions and explained why they were wrong or right.

One part of the session that could have been improved

  • The questions could have been shorter without having to read huge chunks of code.

Peer assessors present

  • Abdulrahman Hizam Omran (aomr001)
  • Hung Pan (hpan027)
  • Tzu-Lun Wong (twon069)
  • Zijie Yang (zyan057)