SE251:Session 1 report by group 5
| Assessment criteria | Score |
|---|---|
| The session content is relevant to the course | 5 |
| The session has been a useful aid to your own learning | 4 |
| The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented | 4 |
| You have learnt something new from the session | 4 |
Justification for the above scores
The questions were very focused at one particular aspect of Java and object oriented programming making it helpful. There were a few points that some of the members were unsure of when it came to justifying answers, however they were only minor and didn't detract from the overall presentation that much.
One aspect of the session that was particularly good
Each question required a deep understanding of one particular area which made them very effective at teaching one thing.
One part of the session that could have been improved
A few of the questions took a long time to answer, and involved doing things that did not relate to the question, such as reading through code that wasn't relevant to the question topic. There were also some minor spelling errors.
Peer assessors present
Vincent Jean Seong Budelmann (vbud003)
Samuel Perry Dalton (sdal039)
Samar Ghalib Abdul Rahman Ghalib (sgha014)
Medha Ghatikesh (mgha023)