SE251:Session 1 report by group 2
| Assessment criteria | Score |
|---|---|
| The session content is relevant to the course | 5 |
| The session has been a useful aid to your own learning | 4 |
| The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented | 4 |
| You have learnt something new from the session | 5 |
Justification for the above scores
The session was very good as a revision. Most members of the group did well. Some didn't present good questions at all. We have learnt to be very careful with JAVA in terms of case sensitivity and strict syntax.
Most questions were very relevant and most members demonstrated good understanding of what they are talking about.
One aspect of the session that was particularly good
Each question was unique. There was no overlapping between them. Having some questions with real code was very helpful because it increases our awareness of the variety of ways in which the syntax can be written.
One part of the session that could have been improved
The part about "this" keyword could have been done better. The member told us that the question is there to make us revise "this" key word but the answer to the question was very irrelevant!
Peer assessors present
Laura Joan Laycock (llay008)
Mohammad Abdulnasir Abdullatif (mabd065)
Hussain Al-Saady (hals016)
Sidney Tsang (stsa027)