SE251:Session7Group2
Assessment criteria | Score |
---|---|
The session content is relevant to the course | 4 |
The session has been a useful aid to your own learning | 5 |
The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented | 4 |
You have learnt something new from the session | 5 |
What was done well
- The powerpoint explaining the principles behind NestingShape was very thorough and well-explained.
- The recursive function was very interesting.
What could have been done differently
- The first speaker spoke far to quietly and could not be heard.
- The path function for NestingShape was gone over three times, yet there was no discussion on the add and remove functions.
- It was disappointing that more was not done to relate the first task to the template method which was used to implement it.
What was interesting
- Seeing some more of the optional tasks from BounceI.
Peer assessors present
Shu Fang Huang (shua066)
Laura Joan Laycock (llay008)
Hussain Al-Saady (hals016)
Mohammad Abdulnasir Abdullatif (mabd065)