SE251:Session5Group6

From Marks Wiki
Revision as of 05:20, 3 November 2008 by Mark (talk | contribs) (4 revision(s))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Assessment criteria Score
The session content is relevant to the course 5
The session has been a useful aid to your own learning 5
The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented 4
You have learnt something new from the session 4


Justification for the above scores

  • Postmortem on assignment 2.
  • Different type of solution can be seen.
  • Certain codes could be abbreviated to do the same thing.
  • The optional task was pretty interesting.

One aspect of the session that was particularly good

  • The slide show was a good touch, due to boredom at repeatedly looking at eclipse.

One part of the session that could have been improved

  • Certain codes could be abbreviated to do the same thing.

Peer assessors present

  • Abdulrahman Hizam Omran (aomr001)
  • Hung Pan (hpan027)
  • Tzu-Lun Wong (twon069)
  • Zijie Yang (zyan057)