SE251:Session5Group2
Assessment criteria | Score |
---|---|
The session content is relevant to the course | 5 |
The session has been a useful aid to your own learning | 5 |
The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented | 4 |
You have learnt something new from the session | 5 |
Justification for the above scores
The speakers on the whole knew the assignment and related topics very well, with the exception for one speaker, who didn't seem too well prepared for the session. The speaker for the optional task did especially well, spending a considerable amount of time on preparation. The only slight criticism is that he explained parts of the optional tasks rather quickly.
One aspect of the session that was particularly good
Very good preparation by the group. Learnt several useful things in the session.
One part of the session that could have been improved
Perhaps going over the first two tasks could have been omitted altogether. Also, task 5 could have been presented more fluently.
Peer assessors present
Shu Fang Huang (shua066)
Laura Joan Laycock (llay008)
Hussain Al-Saady (hals016)
Sidney Tsang (stsa027)