SE251:Session4HongYul

Assessment criteria	Score
The session content is relevant to the course	5
The session has been a useful aid to your own learning	5
The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented	5
You have learnt something new from the session	5

Justification for the above scores

Overall the group did an excellent job. The session was a great way to sum up the materials on polymorphism, interfaces, generics and collections, which the group covered quite thoroughly. The multiple choice questions were cute. They highlighted some of the finer points of generics (static generic methods and multiple type bounds) and use of interfaces. The open-ended questions were especially good as they delved further into the use of collections and iterators, highlighting some "gotchas" along the way.

One aspect of the session that was particularly good

I really liked the way the group presented the session and engaged the fellow students into participating. It was clear the group made a hearty effort in preparing the material and buying (or stealing?) the chocolates.

One part of the session that could have been improved

Mainly presentational aspects. Some of the questions were rather hard to swallow as they weren't given sufficient context, e.g. Pokemon - I liked the intent but it called for clarification. Similarly a number of the answers I felt could have been explained in more detail. I know this is hard to do, but I think it's worth pointing out.

Peer assessors present

Me, myself and I