SE251:Session4Group2

From Marks Wiki
Revision as of 05:20, 3 November 2008 by Mark (talk | contribs) (2 revision(s))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Assessment criteria Score
The session content is relevant to the course 5
The session has been a useful aid to your own learning 4
The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented 4
You have learnt something new from the session 5


Justification for the above scores

Their work on generics and collections was very detailed and outlined some key issues involved with the concepts. A good contribution towards the two topics.

One aspect of the session that was particularly good

A competition was held and our group won, hence we got some chocolates :D.

One part of the session that could have been improved

The marking part seems to have been burdened by only 1-2 markers and thus we had to be patient to see the results of the competition.

Peer assessors present

Shu Fang Huang (shua066)

Laura Joan Laycock (llay008)

Mohammad Abdulnasir Abdullatif (mabd065)

Hussain Al-Saady (hals016)

Sidney Tsang (stsa027)