Mark: 2 revision(s)

2008-11-03T05:21:30Z

2 revision(s)

New page

=Meeting with Ian=

==Conference paper==
* Ian has read the evaluation section and had a few comments:
** Include the specifications for the task that the participants had to do
** Include the specifications that show of more of the fancy stuff that Hermes does. But say that only a small scope was chosen for the evaluation
** Mention the things that cannot be done manually
***Perhaps have this represented in a tabular format
** State the reasons for why we did the experiment the way that we did
*** I.e. why we chose two groups, A and B? Reasons for the timing? etc
** Describe what were the things you were seeking from the questionnaire for the survey
** Show a screen shot of one of the applications that we got the users to test, so that we can tie this into the specifications
** Don't call them errors, perhaps deviations
** Spell out exactly what the faults were. I.e. functional navigation
** Regarding the graphs, be careful about colours as it will be printed in black and white. Also note this for the FR.
** Mention the differences between vendor emulators and Sun emulators
** Justify the conduction of the experiment, using HCI best practices
** Look at the design section and try to bring up to date

==Extensibility==
* Image capture is a good scenario
** Can be used to describe the viewing of tables that can't fit on the screen.
* Another extensibility to Hermes is the design of a tool that shows a visual model of the GUI, which states the names of components and the associated component types
* Rename Performance to Performance environment

SE401:Group32:August 25 - Revision history

Mark: 2 revision(s)