Mark: 1 revision(s)

2008-11-03T05:20:59Z

1 revision(s)

New page

<br />
----
<br />

{| border="1" cellpadding="5"
!Assessment criteria
!Score
|-
|The session content is relevant to the course
|''5''
|-
|The session has been a useful aid to your own learning
|''4''
|-
|The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented
|''4''
|-
|You have learnt something new from the session
|''4''
|}

<br />
==== Justification for the above scores ====
* Question 2257: Good, demonstrates a number of important OO concepts
* Question 2255: Again, requires knowledge of a range of concepts
* Question 2221: Sound question on method overloading, but could have been expanded to address other topics
* Question 2212: Interesting question, though not as useful as the others

==== One aspect of the session that was particularly good ====
* Crossword was an innovative and effective way of testing OO material and introducing some new knowedge

==== One part of the session that could have been improved ====
* Some coverage of exception handling would have been nice and timely

==== Peer assessors present ====
* Krishant Lodhia (klod004)
* Arshdeep Singh (asin185)
* Haroun Barazanchi (hbar055)
* Anushka Lakmal Nanayakkara (anan019)
* Qi-Shan Lim (qlim001)

SE251:Session 2 report by group 4 - Revision history

Mark: 1 revision(s)