Mark: 2 revision(s)

2008-11-03T05:20:58Z

2 revision(s)

New page

{| border="1" cellpadding="5"
!Assessment criteria
!Score
|-
|The session content is relevant to the course
|''5''
|-
|The session has been a useful aid to your own learning
|''5''
|-
|The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented
|''4''
|-
|You have learnt something new from the session
|''5''
|}

<br />
==== Justification for the above scores ====
''Group 1 did an excellent job with these questions and their explanations. They did have some difficulty displaying them in such a way that people could work them out in a lecture setting. Not a major issue though, and they probably didn't realise fitting the question and options on a single page would be important.''

==== One aspect of the session that was particularly good ====
''For the most part, the difficulty of the questions was spot on. Usually the majority of groups got them right, but it wasn't a case of everyone knowing the answer straight away, even top students were challenged at times.''

==== One part of the session that could have been improved ====
''The explanation of the 'this' keyword, though reasonably good in most respects, was backwards (for lack of a better word). As far as I remember it was explained that 'this' is used to refer to variables inside a method, so that you can differentiate between variables in the method and variables in the class. But 'this' actually refers to variables in the class. It's 'this' as in 'this object', not 'this' as in 'this method'.''

==== Peer assessors present ====
''Shrikkanth Sreedharan (ssre005)''

''Braedon Fraser Vickers (bvic005)''

''David John Olsen (dols008)''

''Han lin (hlin079)''

''Jonathan James Andrew Smith (jsmi233)''

''Sutirtha Basak (sbas046)''

SE251:Session 1 report by group 8 - Revision history

Mark: 2 revision(s)