Mark: 13 revision(s)

2008-11-03T05:20:58Z

13 revision(s)

New page

----
<br />

{| border="1" cellpadding="5"
!Assessment criteria
!Score
|-
|The session content is relevant to the course
|''5''
|-
|The session has been a useful aid to your own learning
|''5''
|-
|The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented
|''4''
|-
|You have learnt something new from the session
|''5''
|}

<br />
==== Justification for the above scores ====
''Overall, Group 1 has presented useful questions for students to learn the relevant topics covered in the first two weeks: Java basics, object-based programming and JUnit tests. The questions have enabled active thinking and learning. Group 1 has demonstrated good understanding to the related subjects. Well Done! Team 1… ''

Q1:

- An useful topic. However, the indicated topic for this question - the ‘this’ keyword, is not what the question is focusing on. I would suggest the topic to be rather ‘importing packages’.

Q2:

- Good question with a good difficulty level assessing arrays, parameter passing and loops

Q3:

- An easy question assessing the ‘switch case’ structure.

- Good explanation to this question demonstrates thorough understanding to the topic

Q4:

- This is an interesting question

- Unfortunately, the question has a few spelling errors, though the multiple choice answers are easy to pick up.

- The relevant topics for this question could also include ‘Class members’, to be more specific.

Q5:

- This is an excellent question that facilitates learning of test cases. Clear explanations are also provided indicating good understanding of the test case methods.

Q6:

- A good question, but could simply ask, without the many code snippets, how the main method should be defined in a Java application, e.g. with the correct visibility, class modifier, method return type, etc.

Q7:

- This is an easy but useful question for understanding how to import java packages.

==== One aspect of the session that was particularly good ====
''The detailed explanations to the answers are particularly useful for learning the topics.''

==== One part of the session that could have been improved ====
''It would be necessary to include a question regarding to how to created instances, and how to access instance variables/methods. Question 1 contains a bit of this, but does not sufficiently assess this.''

==== Peer assessors present ====
''Richard Li''

SE251:Session 1 report by Richard - Revision history

Mark: 13 revision(s)