Mark: 4 revision(s)

2008-11-03T05:20:57Z

4 revision(s)

New page

{| border="1" cellpadding="5"
!Assessment criteria
!Score
|-
|The session content is relevant to the course
|''4''
|-
|The session has been a useful aid to your own learning
|''5''
|-
|The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented
|''4''
|-
|You have learnt something new from the session
|''5''
|}

<br />
===What was done well===

*The powerpoint explaining the principles behind NestingShape was very thorough and well-explained.
*The recursive function was very interesting.

===What could have been done differently===

*The first speaker spoke far to quietly and could not be heard.
*The path function for NestingShape was gone over three times, yet there was no discussion on the add and remove functions.
*It was disappointing that more was not done to relate the first task to the template method which was used to implement it.

===What was interesting===

*Seeing some more of the optional tasks from BounceI.

===Peer assessors present===

Shu Fang Huang (shua066)

Laura Joan Laycock (llay008)

Hussain Al-Saady (hals016)

Mohammad Abdulnasir Abdullatif (mabd065)

SE251:Session7Group2 - Revision history

Mark: 4 revision(s)