Mark: 3 revision(s)

2008-11-03T05:20:56Z

3 revision(s)

New page

{| border="1" cellpadding="5"
!Assessment criteria
!Score
|-
|The session content is relevant to the course
|''5''
|-
|The session has been a useful aid to your own learning
|''4''
|-
|The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented
|''4''
|-
|You have learnt something new from the session
|''4''
|}

<br />
==== Justification for the above scores ====

* Task 1: It was well presented and explained, I felt they may have included too much info in their diagram.
* Task 2: It was easy to explain.
* Task 3: They had an error with the width of their Gem Shape. Which was cleared out with the help of a discussion.
* Task 4: They forgot to set the colour back to black from red after the shape hit the sides so the border of the normal shape changed colour from black to red.
* Task 5: @_@ so epileptic lol

==== One aspect of the session that was particularly good ====
Slides were used to aid in explanations but then they switched over to Eclipse to show examples.

==== One part of the session that could have been improved ====
Speak up!

==== Assessed By ====

Joon Ha Park (jpar277)

==== Peer assessors present ====
Joon Ha Park (jpar277)

Varun Prasad (vpra017)

Archana Pratthi (apra102)

Matthew Scott Spencer (mspe044)

Tom Yige Lou (tlou006)

SE251:Session6Group7 - Revision history

Mark: 3 revision(s)