<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://wiki.kram.nz/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=SE251%3ASession6Group6</id>
	<title>SE251:Session6Group6 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.kram.nz/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=SE251%3ASession6Group6"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.kram.nz/index.php?title=SE251:Session6Group6&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-20T13:20:31Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.kram.nz/index.php?title=SE251:Session6Group6&amp;diff=9474&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Mark: 5 revision(s)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.kram.nz/index.php?title=SE251:Session6Group6&amp;diff=9474&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2008-11-03T05:20:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;5 revision(s)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Assessment criteria&lt;br /&gt;
!Score&lt;br /&gt;
|-https://www.se.auckland.ac.nz/wiki2008/index.php?title=SE251:Session6Group6&amp;amp;action=edit&lt;br /&gt;
|The session content is relevant to the course&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;5&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|The session has been a useful aid to your own learning&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;4&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;3&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|You have learnt something new from the session&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;3&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Justification for the above scores ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Postmortem on assignment 3.&lt;br /&gt;
*Different type of solution can be seen.&lt;br /&gt;
*Good knowledge of UML, with clear drawing done on computer and presented on slides.&lt;br /&gt;
*Gem shape co-ordinates and width are mistaken it seems.&lt;br /&gt;
*Only 1 boolean needed in Dynamic Rectangle, whether it should be colour&amp;#039;d or not.&lt;br /&gt;
*The check &amp;quot;if ( A || (A &amp;amp;&amp;amp; B) ) to detect collisions could have been simplified to &amp;quot;if (A)&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Wouldn&amp;#039;t modifying the shape template class to work for the dynamic rectangle create a lot of useless variables and methods for the other shapes?&lt;br /&gt;
*Dynamic Rectangle&amp;#039;s solution were rather complicated.&lt;br /&gt;
*It appears the Dynamic Rectangle solution were wrong...&lt;br /&gt;
*The second Dynamic Rectangle did not reset the colour back...................&lt;br /&gt;
*The colour changing shape was interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
*The aggregated shape was interesting, although there are easier solution but her solution has it&amp;#039;s advantage of being more robust, and easier to switch between more shapes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== One aspect of the session that was particularly good ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Again, the slide show was used, which was good.&lt;br /&gt;
*The presentation integrated the new material we have been learning (UML/sequence diagrams) which added a bit of helpful revision to the postmortem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== One part of the session that could have been improved ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Could speak louder.&lt;br /&gt;
*The click click sound was annoying at start. (not sure if it&amp;#039;s from them tho)&lt;br /&gt;
*Test the code before the presentation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Peer assessors present ====&lt;br /&gt;
*Abdulrahman Hizam Omran (aomr001) &lt;br /&gt;
*Hung Pan (hpan027) &lt;br /&gt;
*Tzu-Lun Wong (twon069) &lt;br /&gt;
*Zijie Yang (zyan057)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mark</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>