<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://wiki.kram.nz/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=SE251%3ASession3Group7</id>
	<title>SE251:Session3Group7 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.kram.nz/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=SE251%3ASession3Group7"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.kram.nz/index.php?title=SE251:Session3Group7&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-06T20:24:31Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.kram.nz/index.php?title=SE251:Session3Group7&amp;diff=9371&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Mark: 4 revision(s)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.kram.nz/index.php?title=SE251:Session3Group7&amp;diff=9371&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2008-11-03T05:20:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;4 revision(s)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Assessment criteria&lt;br /&gt;
!Score&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|The session content is relevant to the course&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;5&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|The session has been a useful aid to your own learning&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;5&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;5&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|You have learnt something new from the session&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;#039;&amp;#039;5&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Justification for the above scores ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The part A explanations were adequate. The code&amp;#039;s function was explained well but lacked additional explanation on the thought process in the creation of the code. The second part B were very clear and informative and provided a good example of OO programming, especially the optional task.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== One aspect of the session that was particularly good ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The OO implementation explanation was very detailed.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== One part of the session that could have been improved ====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Overall the session was good. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Peer assessors present ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Joon Ha Park (jpar277)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Varun Prasad (vpra017)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Archana Pratthi (apra102)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Matthew Scott Spencer (mspe044)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Tom Yige Lou (tlou006) &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mark</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>