Mark: 1 revision(s)

2008-11-03T05:20:55Z

1 revision(s)

New page

{| border="1" cellpadding="5"
!Assessment criteria
!Score
|-
|The session content is relevant to the course
|''5''
|-
|The session has been a useful aid to your own learning
|''5''
|-
|The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented
|''5''
|-
|You have learnt something new from the session
|''5''
|}

<br />
==== Justification for the above scores ====
This session was pretty different from what has been done so far. The relevance is a given, because we've all had to work our way through the assignment. It was very interesting to see what other people came up as solutions, and certainly taught us a few approaches we didn't think of ourselves. The team presenting seemed to all knew what they were doing, especially the last person, who obviously put a lot of effort into his programme.

==== One aspect of the session that was particularly good ====
Seeing how other people approach the problems, in both the code and in the discussions about the code, was very interesting.

==== One part of the session that could have been improved ====
A bit of repetitive having everyone go through their code. Perhaps simply highlighting the differences would have been enough.

==== Peer assessors present ====
*Abdulrahman Hizam Omran (aomr001)
*Hung Pan (hpan027)
*Tzu-Lun Wong (twon069)
*Zijie Yang (zyan057)

SE251:Session3Group6 - Revision history

Mark: 1 revision(s)