Mark: 7 revision(s)

2008-11-03T05:20:54Z

7 revision(s)

New page

{| border="1" cellpadding="5"
!Assessment criteria
!Score
|-
|The session content is relevant to the course
|5
|-
|The session has been a useful aid to your own learning
|4
|-
|The team presenting the session has demonstrated that they have understood what they have presented
|5
|-
|You have learnt something new from the session
|5
|}

<br />
==== Justification for the above scores ====
The groud show us what they have done on the signment,different people show us the different ways to solve the problem, and how to test it work it more correctly.

==== One aspect of the session that was particularly good ====
One of them show us the different way show the work inside the code, like print out each statement each transection.

==== One part of the session that could have been improved ====
one guy show us the problem,but didnt clearly explain why it wrong and how to fix it.

==== Peer assessors present ====
''
Shu Fang Huang (shua066)

Laura Joan Laycock (llay008)

Mohammad Abdulnasir Abdullatif (mabd065)

Hussain Al-Saady (hals016)

Sidney Tsang (stsa027)''

SE251:Session3Group2 - Revision history

Mark: 7 revision(s)