<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://wiki.kram.nz/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=SE250%3AJune_6</id>
	<title>SE250:June 6 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.kram.nz/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=SE250%3AJune_6"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.kram.nz/index.php?title=SE250:June_6&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-28T18:42:08Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.kram.nz/index.php?title=SE250:June_6&amp;diff=3806&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Mark: 9 revision(s)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.kram.nz/index.php?title=SE250:June_6&amp;diff=3806&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2008-11-03T05:18:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;9 revision(s)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;===Minutes===&lt;br /&gt;
Last session of SE250 for 08!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Started of by doing the course survey for SE250 for Mark Wilson&lt;br /&gt;
*Email John Hamer the contributions to the HHTB you have made by today!&lt;br /&gt;
*The maximum internal marks one can get is 30%, of which 15% is for contributions made to the HTTB.&lt;br /&gt;
*Went over parts of the HTTB, the Big-O part of the course was quickly looked at and Mark suggested better labeling of the graphs,&lt;br /&gt;
something for quality control to do!&lt;br /&gt;
*Amortized Time Analysis was only covered vaguely!&lt;br /&gt;
*Discussion on the structure of the course,the validity of the HTTB and other coursework were questioned. An assignment was suggested in place of the HTTB.&lt;br /&gt;
*Had a look at the first SE250 exam paper in the first year of SE&lt;br /&gt;
*Question 13 seemed interesting to do&lt;br /&gt;
* Went over the 2004 paper as well to see the different types of questions asked in the past, 2004 paper had a few mistakes in it.&lt;br /&gt;
* Had a look at the jigsaw puzzle question! didnt make much sense...maybe the question was off a lab that year?!&lt;br /&gt;
* Had a discussion about Google and why it was so successful, Google uses a link analysis among other complexities&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Minutes taken by:===&lt;br /&gt;
srag014&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mark</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>